The Blomfield Files – Toresen & Thompson Private Dicks, Who Is Daniel Toresen?

Daniel James Toresen aka Ace Venturer Pet Detective and all round fucktard.

Daniel James Toresen (aka Ace Venturer Pet Detective), completely corrupt, friend to criminals, bent ex cops and all round fuckwit. Daniels investigative specialities include tittle-tattle and fitting square pegs into round holes for his clients

In one of our previous posts, “The ace ventura pet detectives club”, LF exposed the fraudulent criminal complaint that had been filed with the New Zealand Police’s Sergeant Grant Harris at their Glen Innes station by Matthew John Blomfield and Martin Russell Honey, the location is very important.

We will be going into a little more detail about Blomfield and his co-conspirators reasons for having committed this particular crime but in this post we would like to give our readers more information on the so-called private investigator that aided and abetted Blomfield and Honey’s conspiracy.

The private investigator concerned is one Daniel Toresen (aka any assorted mix of the following; Danny, Dan, Toresen-Thompson, Thompson, “book em Danno”). Toresen is a director of a number of New Zealand companies, all of them related to the security and investigations industry (many of them having been struck off over the years). Although having said that LF knows that he is not the owner director of the company listed on his website.

 

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Toresen’s father Daniel Andrew Thompson, now semi retired, was also a director of the current trading entity and a number of other companies (listed in the bibliography below) since his departure from the New Zealand Police force in 1980.

In fact its was that list list of companies that first caught the eye of our researchers back in 2013 when LF was first alerted to the fact that Blomfield was likely up to no good. Two companies in particular stood out as exemplars, concealing the link to a wonderful trove of historic information held by LF’s sister organisation in its archives that could well explain Daniel James Toresen’s apparent preparedness to assist Matthew Blomfield in manufacturing a false police compliant by knowingly supplying a false police statement to the investigating officer concerned, one Sergeant Grant Harris of Glen Innes (County Manukau District Command);

click to enlarge

click to enlarge

On the Toresen & Thompson website Daniel boasts that the firm has “thirty years experience” in policing matters, although who ever drafted the crap provides scant detail of what that thirty years comprised so lets take a closer look.

Daniel James Thompson Toresen has absolutely no hands on policing experience himself. His father however, Daniel Andrew Thompson is indeed a very inetersting subject, as are some of his bent ex-cop mates. Daniel sr, was a New Zealand police officer for a period. Thompson sr graduated from Sacred Heart Boys College in 1961, a couple of years later he entered the New Zealand police force, his uninspiring police career terminating in 1980, jumping before he was pushed, so to speak. In those final years in the New Zealand police  force Thompson sr served at various stations, inclusive of Otahuhu, in the Counties Manukau Area Command, then a notoriously corrupt police district, far more so than the reputation for corrupt police practices that it still enjoys.

Dan Thompson, aka Danny and Daniel Andrew

Lewis Proctors mate Dan Thompson, aka Danny and Daniel Andrew Thompson circa 2009

During his last years in the police LF’s archives have Thompson working along-side a notoriously corrupt Kiwi police officer who was also attached to the Counties Manukau area command. That bent cop was one Detective Sergeant Lewis Noel Proctor. Proctor is perhaps best known for his sham investigation of Helen Clarke at the behest of the strange Kiwi religious cult known as the “Bretheran”. Proctor, like his mate Thompson, also left the police force, although in Proctors case he was well and truly pushed before he could jump and for very good reason.

Proctor was unceremoniously sacked from the police force in 1982 after an occasion were he rapidly descended into an alcohol fueled psychotic rampage, assaulting senior police officers and civilian being held in custody in the process. As the New Zealand Heralds Patrick Gower reported at the time of the Helen Clarke fiasco (more material available in the bibliography below):

Brethren’s investigator went berserk at station

3rd October 2003

Patrick Gower

The investigator hired by the Exclusive Brethren to tail Prime Minister Helen Clark assaulted a man in custody and kicked a senior police officer in the groin during a bar-room brawl 25 years ago.

Herald files show private investigator Lew Proctor was convicted of assaulting three officers and another man after going berserk during a drinking session at the Papakura Police Station bar when still in the force as a detective in 1982.

The Herald files show Proctor struck one constable, headbutted another constable in the face and intentionally kicked Inspector Barry Davies in the groin as well as intentionally damaging a door.

Proctor’s rage began after a heated conversation about dogs with other officers in the bar, where he was saying he wanted to “show how he had hit the black Samoan bastard who hit his dog”.

He started taking several swings at a constable, putting his fist through a door, smashing a door and putting his fist through a toilet wall.

He then punched one of the constables in the face several times, butted the other and lashed out at Mr Davies, kicking him in the groin and later in the backside.

At some point, Proctor went into an interview room where a man was being held in custody, asked him a few questions, then punched him twice about the head.

In his defence, Proctor claimed he was suffering temporary insanity.

Source: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10404033

LF records show that Daniel Thompson Sr maintained a close friendship with Proctor despite his old Sergeants proclivity for suffering prolonged periods of madness, or “temporary insanity” as Proctor advised the court back in 1982.

In fact the pair have remained almost inseparable right up to the present day. As befitted the closeness of this typical corrupt ex-cop relationship Proctor and Thompson worked alongside each other subsequent to their respective departures from the New Zealand police force during the period 1980, when Thompson left, and eighteen months later, 1982, when Proctor was punted and charged with various criminal offences in the process, although, as was pretty much par for the course during that era, Proctor managed to escape an appropriate sentence.

During this same period the pair, Proctor and Thompson, were introduced to another ex-cop, Scottish emigre Ronald McQuilter, an ex United Kingdom police officer. The late 1980 ‘s saw Proctor and McQuilter and likely Thompson working together at Nationwide investigations. By the early 1990’s all three are to be found working together in various capacities and business, a pattern of behaviour that has continued up to the present day.

From left: Ron McQuilter, Daniel Thompson (Snr), Lewis Proctor

Ex-cops, birds of a feather – From left: Ron McQuilter, Daniel Thompson (Sr), Lewis Proctor

In fact so good were their respective working relationships that this trio eventually shared the ownership of several businesses during the two decades that followed, at least until Proctor was caught up in the aforementioned scandal involving New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clarke.

Proctors investigation into New Zealand PM Helen Clarke eventually descended into a farce, back-firing dramatically with both Proctor and another of his ex-cop colleagues, Wayne Idour, facing the wrath of their fellow private investigators, politicians and the public

PM’s stalkers face wrath of country’s private eyes

22-Oct-2006

The private investigators hired by Exclusive Brethren members to follow Helen Clark and senior members of her cabinet have been called before the ethics committee of their professional body. The Sunday Star-Times understands that the New Zealand Institute of Professional Investigators will launch an inquiry into Wayne Idour and Lew Proctor on the grounds they broke the code of ethics by bragging about evidence on the prime minister they did not have.

Earlier this month Proctor told the Star-Times he was waiting on explosive information he believed could bring down Clark and the government, later likening it to “TNT times five million”.

Idour, who was subcontracted by Proctor, claimed the information involved overspending and cover-ups and that Labour MPs had offered hush money to keep details under wraps. 
They then backed away from the statements and have provided no further information.

Proctor said what was done with the information was up to the Brethren members who employed him. 
Clark dismissed the private investigators’ claims as bizarre and an “extraordinary, unfortunate, regrettable development in New Zealand life”. 
”I consider it a new low in political life to have political opponents paying to have me, my spouse, other Labour ministers followed in this way,” she said. 
The revelation that the Exclusive Brethren, who met National leader Don Brash before last year’s election and distributed anti-Labour and anti-Green party pamphlets, had hired private investigators came during an unusual period of political mud slinging.


Investigate magazine ran a photo taken on election night of Clark’s husband Peter Davis hugging a so-called mystery man. He was Auckland GP Dr Ian Scott who promptly scotched suggestions Davis was gay in a Star-Times article. 
The previous week Brash had been outed for having an affair with Business Roundtable deputy chair Diane Foreman and pundits wrote that politics was heading down a slippery slope.

The committee investigating Idour and Proctor is understood to be chaired by Wellington private investigator Trevor Morley, though he refused to comment. 
Idour and Proctor are members of the institute and bound by its code of ethics, which state that they shall undertake their work with “the highest moral principles and with truthfulness and integrity”. 
They must also “at all times take every care to ensure the professional reputation of the institute, our members and principals are not compromised” and are required to account for themselves before the ethics committee if called upon. The committee can issue a censure, suspension or kick them out of the institute. 
Idour said he knew nothing about the ethics committee investigation and Proctor did not return calls. 
Prime Minister Helen Clark said the institute was entitled to take steps to safeguard the standards of its ethical members and “we look forward to seeing the outcome” of the hearing.

Source: Sunday Star Times – story no longer available on stuff.co.nz

LF finds it somewhat strange that New Zealand Herald Journo David Fisher in the article above refers to Proctor as a “Former high ranking police officer” Mr Fisher should rethink his notion of what constitutes a high rank in the New Zealand Police, sergeant certainly doesn’t. Then there’s the additional fact that Daniel Toresens “mentor”, Lewis Proctor, would have been much better described as a hopeless and violent alcoholic. A pisshead that was very much a part of the seriously corrupt police culture that existed in the New Zealand police force during the 1970’s through to the 1990’s.

The reality is however that David Fishers description of Proctor was not unusual for the period, most Kiwi journos and editors preferred to kowtow to the police and were never inclined to investigate police corruption let alone publish exposes on the many corruption cases that surfaced during the period. More often than not editors were to be found complicit in concealing serious police corruption, most probably out of a fear that they and their newspaper would be made persona non grata with New Zealands police national headquarters. It was not until the Louise Nicholas case and Phil Kitchin’s expose that the mainstream media was dragged kicking and screaming into the real world, the world of those who had been suffering for decades at the hands of abusive cops and a culture of systemic police corruption.

The apex of the relationships between these wannabe “secret Squirrels” came in August 2006 when Daniel James Thompson-Toresen, his father Daniel Andrew Thompson and Ronald McQuilter once again joined forces to form what was at the time heralded as New Zealand’s largest private investigation and security company, Paragon NZ Limited, which was in reality a phoenix, and its related entity Paragon New Zealand.com Limited;

Screen Shot 2014-07-28 at 10.43.31 am

Click to enlarge

Compared to his very dull partners McQuilter had always been more of a show-pony entrepenureal type than he was a good grass roots investigator. In fact the narcissistic tendancy thats often now demonstrated by Daniel James Thompson-Toresen aka Thompson Jr, the propensity for exaggeration and the need to lie about his capabilities and company’s standing can be traced back to his association with Ron McQuilter and his savy usery of the local press.

McQuilter the minute he set foot in New Zealand started courting the media so as to promote himself. First befriending the now deceased Warren Berryman of National Business Review (NBR) fame and seriously corrupt journo, later Berryman’s wife, Jenni McManus.

Media whore Ron McQuilters National Business Review mates, Jenni McManus and Warren Berryman

Media whore Ron McQuilters National Business Review mates, Jenni McManus and Warren Berryman

Berryman, a man who had absolutely no scruples, had little problem bending the truth on occasion and often had McQuilter write material for the National Business Review, Berryman often also taking credit for the work. Nevertheless McQuilter soon learned the value of staying very close to the media, it’s publicity generating capacity and has always sort out the limelight at every opportunity since. That relationship with the media is worth remembering as LF will be posting more on those seriously compromised relationships in the future,

First it was newspaper interviews, then being asked for comment on almost everything and anything criminal, finally he finishing up with a role in a half arsed Kiwi television series.

The crux of it is however that these ex-cops, two of whom LF knows for certain were corrupt police officers, where the very same mentors, who comprised the “30 years” police experience boasted of on Teresen’s website, who Daniel James Thompson aka Toresen no doubt looked up to, hanging on their every word.

Shit even the name “Toresen” is an ego driven fantasy, the fabrication of a parvenu wanting to be seen as someone more sophisticated than he actually is. Although Thompson Jr, obviously having been questioned too often about it, perhaps given his far from Nordic colouring, did manage to explain it away nicely for his old school magazine a few years back:

Daniel THOMPSON-TORESEN (‘85) is in partnership with his father Daniel THOMPSON (‘63), they operate a private investigation security management business in Auckland called Thompson-Toresen

The Investigators. Where does theToresen name come into this? The Norwegian family name was Toresen and was Anglicised to Thompson. Because Daniel and his father share the same Christian name, and being in business together, there was some confusion, so Daniel jr became Toresen reverting back to his original family name.

Source: https://laudafinem.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/confortare-july-2012.pdf (Sacred Heart College magazine “Confortare” July 2012, Pg 14, “Old Boys” Retrieved February 4th 2014)

Now the thing about old school cops everywhere, and in particular New Zealand, a country that has yet to have a Royal Commission to investigate it’s police forces corruption, is that they stick together, like shit to a blanket, closing ranks in support of those who have been caught fiddling with evidence, or fitting up innocent victims.

It’s this particular aspect of Daniel Toresen’s “training” under both his father Daniel Thompson Sr and his bent buddy, Lewis Noel Proctor, that is now becoming apparent. Daniel was clearly schooled extremely well in the wily ways most often associated with bent cops like his father and “Uncle Lew”.

Screen Shot 2014-07-28 at 10.51.19 am

Toresen falsely claims on his website that his father founded the business, more smoke and mirrors

click to enlarge

click to enlarge

Put succinctly, Daniel Toresen will find it exceptionally hard to now hide his activities and the true agenda behind his unlawful actions, all proving beyond any doubt the fact that he and the other unpaid “staffers” working for his private investigation business are inherently corrupt. The fact that they have had ongoing dealings with serial fraudster Matthew John Blomfield, having been an accomplice in the theft and conversion of a government cheque for close to one hundred thousand dollars and have now again teamed up with Blomfield and cyber fraudster Martin Honey and a third group to aid in nefarious attempts to evade justice is but the tip of a rather large iceberg – a wheel, or hub and spoke conspiracy.

There are many more questions that need to be asked of Toresen, the man who apparently loves the phrase “book em Danno”, although once LF exposes this shyster for what he really is that may be about to change to “you’re fucking booked Danno”, or perhaps it’ll just be a civil tort with a rather large damages claim attached filed by all those who have been fleeced or otherwise harmed by “Toresen & Blomfield”.

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

It should also be noted that as recently as May this year, Daniel Toresen was “contracted” by Nottingham to serve criminal summonses on Mrs Stephanie Honey on charges of fraud, a commission he willingly accepted despite having conspired with Blomfield and the Martin Honey to yet again have Nottingham falsely accused of a crime…..more about that and all those involved in upcoming posts. LF suspects that Daniel Thompson-Toresen is well aware of what is about to be made very public.

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Of course Daniel Toresen’s bent ex-cop mate Lewis Noel Proctor and LF have had at least one run in before now. There was one occasion back in August 2010 when LF had published a piece exposing Nationwide Investigations and Lewis Proctors involvement in police corruption and the covering up of serious systemic offending by fellow police officers who had been responsible for the kidnapping and torture of East Cape Rasta Dickie “Diesel” Maxwell. Proctor really took exception to that article and emailed LF to express his disappointment, both Proctors response and the kidnapping of Maxwell had at least one thing in common, both involved threatening violence with a firearm, good old New Zealand, who the fuck would even want to live there:

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Lew Proctor has such a delightfull turn of phrase, he was also amongst the best the New Zealand Police force had to throw at tasks such as manufacting evidence, writing up false police job sheets and reports. Readers can check out LF’s previous posts featuring Lewis Proctor, the violent alcoholic and seriously corrupt South Auckland cop turned private investigator, the man responsible for teaching Daniel Toresen “pet detective” everything the stupid cunt knows:

Lewis Proctor goes berserk! – OMG he’s at it again!

Lewis Proctor – Bent Cop, Piss Head and Magnum P I

NZ Detectives Malcolm Thomas, Lew Proctor and their part in serious police corruption

 

References/Bibliography

Companies owned by, or associated with Toresen, aka Thompson (readers can conduct their own search and obtain further information using the company numbers (below) in the New Zealand Companies Office search engine here):

Crime Risk Control Limited (1114250) registered

New Zealand Background Limited (1178454) struck off

Manukau Investigations Limited (1172598) struck off

QED Consulting Limited (1168943) struck off

Toresen Group Limited (850669) struck off

Thompson & Toresen Investigations Limited ( 2501049) registered

Auckland Investigations Limited (426292) struck off

Auckland Investigations Limited (2249745) registered

Paragon New Zealand.com Limited (1790758) registered

Staff Checks Vetting (1) Limited (1558544) struck off

Staff Checks Vetting Limited (1110008) Struck off

Staff Checks Limited (2110243) registered

Consultants New Zealand Limited (421600) struck off

Corporate Investigation & Security Group Limited (620115) struck off

Morning Star (St Lukes Garden Appartments) Limited (589136) struck off

https://laudafinem.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/confortare-july-2012.pdf

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10846516

http://nz.linkedin.com/pub/daniel-thompson-toresen/1a/902/196

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10404033

 

The Peter Ellis Case – New Zealand, A Queer Nation, In More Ways Than One

Who are these three people, momentarily identified on Michael Laws Talk back radio program? A cameo appearance that the New Zealand Police went to extraordinary lengths to ensure was removed from Youtube.......Why, what needed to be lept from the Kiwi public?

Who were the three people, momentarily identified on Kiwi Radio shock jock Michael Laws program? A brief audio cameo (below) that the New Zealand Police went to extraordinary lengths to have all vestiges of removed from Youtube…….Why the  rush, exactly what horrors needed to be kept from the ears of New Zealanders? If the bent cops involved achieved nothing else, they ensured the audio clips longevity and unwittingly reassured the world that Michael Laws was indeed on the right track.

New Zealands media has been awash in recent days with the story of Big Micky Vukcevic who has admitted falsifying his CV, by adding the undergrad degree of LLB, a qaulification that he simply did not have. Like many before him Vukcevic had nothing more than a BA to his name. Fraudulant behaviour of this sort by Kiwi civil servants and consultants is of concern to us here in Australia. We’ve just seen the case of the New Zealander who took the Queensland Health department for millions. Theres another case however, one thats remained concealed. Its the case of a New Zealander who, a couple of years ago took up residence in Perth, Australia. A woman who lists amongst her many accomplishments having worked for the Australian Department Of Prime Minister and Cabinent. She has even linked the claim, noted in her online “linkedin” profile to the Australian Government website of the Department Of Prime Minister and Cabinent.

Phil Goff, the Kiwi politician that ordered the exquisitely tailored Eichelbaum report.

Scuzzbucket Phil Goff, the Kiwi politician that signed off on the exquisitely tailored Eichelbaum report – a report that fitted up Ellis, and fucked any chance of him receiving justice, just beautifully.

The woman that LF has identified is one Alison Dalziel, ex Kiwi civil Servant and the sister of ex New Zealand member of parliament, turned Christchurch Mayor, Leane Dalziel. Alison Dalziel is, it would appear, attempting to mislead the Australian public. In fact she is obviously attempting to mislead anyone viewing her online CV, inclusive of Australian companies and or individuals who might be considering employing her or working with the company she has apparently establishd here in Perth Australia, a company called Localise Pty Limited, of which she is a director.

Dalziel in fact has never worked for the Australian Office of Prime Minister and Cabinet, of that LF is certain. In fact at the time Dalziel falsely claims to have done so, between March 2003 and December 2004, a period of 20 months, she was in fact working for the New Zealand Prime Minister, Helen Clarke.

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Click to view full page

Click to view full page

Back in December 2012 LF was going to run a series of stories on the Peter Ellis case and the people involved, until that is, we discovered that Dalziel had relocated to Perth, Western Australia in 2009. At that point we dispatched one of the team to WA for their Xmas break, to do a little digging and subsequently decided to hold off publishing the original story.

Lianne Dalziel

Lianne Dalziel

Lianne Audrey Dalziel was born in 1960[2] raised in Christchurch, and attended Canterbury University. She graduated with a law degree and was admitted to the Bar. She served as the legal officer for the Canterbury Hotel and Hospital Workers’ Union, and later became the union’s Secretary. She also participated in national groups such as the Federation of Labour and the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions. – Wikipedia

Name suppression rules need to be tougher

5 OCT 2010

Labour believes rules around name suppression need to be consistent and tougher, says Labour Justice spokesperson Lianne Dalziel.

“If the rules aren’t consistent, it undermines confidence in the justice system,” Lianne Dalziel said.

“If you have one set of rules for the privileged, the wealthy and celebrities, and another set of rules for everyone else, as well as speculation about who is hiding behind suppression orders, it becomes very damaging.

“The case that recently came to light involving former ACT MP David Garrett stealing the identity of a dead baby is a classic example,” Lianne Dalziel said

“His hypocrisy in seeking a suppression order was matched by ACT leader Rodney Hide’s in hiding behind the suppression order and encouraging David Garrett to become a candidate, and by the Sensible Sensible Trust’s Garth McVicar in providing David Garrett with support in court.”

Lianne Dalziel said trial by some media had become an unfortunate reality.

“Fuelling the frenzy with suppression orders that don’t have any justification beyond the ‘celebrity’ status of the person who has been charged doesn’t help.

“People are innocent until proven guilty, but if suppression is allowed inconsistently or unjustifiably, it doesn’t promote faith in the system.

“Being wealthy or famous should not be a reason to get name suppression, nor should a lawyer who has stolen the identity of a dead child be entitled to get name suppression.

“Name suppression should only be used to protect the rights of victims and it should be used only on rare occasions”

Source: https://www.labour.org.nz/media/name-suppression-rules-need-be-tougher

As aforesaid, Alison Dalziel is of course, at best, misleading, the reader of her online CV, she may in fact even be in breach of Australian Commonwealth or Western Australian law, both Commonwealth and State jurisdictions. So is the bullshit CV merely a mistake on Dalziels part? LF suspects not.

There is no plausable reason for Dalziel to be falsely claiming to have been an advisor to the Australian Prime Minister. Sure she could claim that the equivalent New Zealand Govt Department didn’t have an online presence, but of course in that scenario she would be lying again, as the equivalent New Zealand Govt site can be found at http://www.dpmc.govt.nz. So why then has Dalziel used the Australian Govt references, http://au.linkedin.com/company/department-of-the-prime-minister-and-cabinet?trk=ppro_cprof and http://www.dpmc.gov.au?

Well LF believes that the answer to that question is quite simple. Dalziel has used the Australian references as a ruse. A ploy designed to throw researchers off the scent, her scent and its because, we believe, Dalziel does not want researchers linking her, and her reinvented identity and life, to that of the woman who played a major role in the false allegations against Peter Ellis. In fact until now the New Zealand Police have played a major role in ensuring that her identity remained concealed. We know for a fact that the New Zealand police were instrumental in having  the above Michael Laws show sound clip removed from YouTube. An online search of Dalziels name reveals very little that would indicate her involvement in the Ellis case. Extensive research has managed to identify just one web item (outside dedicated Ellis case resources), a single lonely comment on a Google Groups forum dedicated to the detective in charge of the case, The now infamous Christchurch Detective Colin Eade who is now living a quiet life, just one hundred or so kilometres from the scene of his crime, in the South Canterbury township of Ashburton:

Edna Jean

Former Detective COLIN EADE on 20/20 Sunday 31 August, 2003, with
regards to his work on the PETER ELLIS investigation would not tell us
what he was up to regarding intimacy with complainant kid’s parents.
 
Between episodes of work and depression he WAS SHAGGING, among others,
the SISTER of a prominent LABOUR MP.
 
That silly woman, a mother of infant twin daughter complainants,  with
absolutely no good judgment, taste or morals was ALISON DALZIEL,
sister of a current Labour Minister LIANNE DALZIEL..
 
Did you really need to know this?
 
Edna Jean

Source: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/soc.culture.new-zealand/t6lKVqjJQ9Q

Click to enlarge

Click to view screen grab of “Edna Jeans” post

One would expect the above Google thread to be removed, over the coming days, sooner rather than later once the New Zealand police are made aware. Somewhat strangely however, given the notoriety of the Ellis case, there are no photographs of Detective Colin Eade, the plaintiff rooting detective, its almost as if the man never existed, except of course for a fairly recent newspaper article announcing that an ex cop, who had been granted one of New Zealands all too familiar name suppression orders, had been in trouble and again before the courts, and an online white pages listing for one “C. Eade” of 15 Brucefield Ave, Netherby, Ashburton, New Zealand:

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Eade’s questionable relationships with the Civic childcare centre parents, and one of the involved DSW staff did not come out during the trial. Early in the investigation, Eade unsuccessfully sexually propositioned at least one mother (of the first child to formally make an allegation). After the case, he had sexual affairs with two of the childcare centre mothers, and a DSW employee. This brings into question his impartiality. He may well have been trying to please these women for personal reasons. He spoke to the children formally, and one can assume informally. He may have had cause to support the mothers’ allegations or fears when speaking to the children, rather than investigating without fear or favour. Zelas, the prosecution, Justice Williamson, and Eichelbaum clearly had excessive confidence in the quality of the police investigation.

Source: http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/r.christie/6.html

Social influence probably affected the disclosure process. An evidential interviewer or police officer would talk to a suspected victim shortly before the child was formally interviewed. Such conversations were not recorded. Colin Eade, who led the police investigation, monitored many of the formal interviews. He spent up to thirty minutes with chil- dren prior to their interviews and had, according to Lamb, “ample and unchecked opportunities” to shape their claims. He also made unscheduled visits to the children’s homes “to try and [help them] overcome [their fear] prior to evidential interviews”. (Police Report Form, 19 March 1992)

Source: http://www.peterellis.org.nz/2007/2007_francis_new_evidence.pdf

The Ellis case stinks to high heaven, its rotten to the core, its putrid, the secrecy, the involvement of bent cops, a New Zealand police area command that is historically well known for its sexual perversion, police brutality, extreme homophobia and corruption and then there’s the politicians, Lianne Dalziel, Phil Goff, Mark Goshe and later, during the period 1999 -2008, Labour Prime Minster Helen Clarke, the very same Prime Minister that Alison Dalziel served during a 20 month period between 2003 – 2004, the same period in which the Ellis case was again the topic of a national debate, and calls for justice; the very same period in which the investigative current affairs franchise, 20/20, ran an exposé on the case and Alison Dalziels, whilst she was not named, intimate relationship with Detective Colin Eade. That show aired in the August of 2003, just four months after Alison Dalziel had taken up her new, and oh-so convenient, position with Helen Clarkes Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.

Helen Clarke New Zealand Labour Party MP and Prime Minister 1999 -2008

Alison who? Boggle-eyed Helen Clarke, New Zealand Labour Party MP, Prime Minister 1999 – 2008 and Alison Dalziels boss March 2003 – August 2004

So we’ve established that Alison Dalziel now lives in Perth Western Australia, has knowingly falsified her credentials in an online CV, and now runs her own company, a consultancy geared toward Government, quasi Govenment and or NGO’s. We’ve also established that despite her claiming to have worked for the Australian Prime Minister, at that time John Howard, she had in fact been working for New Zealands Prime Minister Helen Clarke.

We’ve also established that this woman was amongst a whole gaggle of fucked up women who were responsible for making false complaints against the five Christchurch Civic Creche workers, including Peter Ellis, and that she is likely one of the women who seriously compromised any chance Peter Ellis ever had of receiving a fair trial by conducting an affair with the completely fucked up and corrupt Detective Colin Eade during the police investigation.

Fuck us sideways, which no doubt the New Zealand police would undoubtedly attempt had team LF been Kiwi’s; just how fucked up is the New Zealand criminal Justice system? Well the answer to that question, if not already obvious to the readers of Lauda Finem, will become increasingly clear as our series on the Ellis case slowly unfolds over the coming months.

The team at LF will be publishing material over the coming twelve months on the Peter Ellis case, we suspect New Zealands most notorious case of malicious prosecution, wrongful conviction and ongoing injustice. A case that has not been addressed, despite the country’s hack politicians promising to do so for decades, despite academics spending months researching and publishing award winning books; that go a long way in proving the prosecutions case a complete and utter sham. Yet despite some very smart and dedicated “out of town” people lining up to support Ellis over the past two decades in his quest for justice, despite a petition signed by some of New Zealands most notable and prominent people, justice has yet to be served; the question must therefore be asked, why? Unlike so many other cases, some arguably far more serious and less convincing, why has justice in Peter Ellis’s case remained elusive.

When we first started to look at the case back in 2012 it looked pretty much like any other of the period, so why the need for the more than obvious political game playing and resistance? As we dug a little deeper however, and looked at some of the concealed factors, personalities and events that had remained very much outside everyones focus during the trial, the so called psych evidence, and the bent prosecution, we started to trip over some pretty nasty political involvement. Aspects to the case that have remained concealed and actively prevented, often by the New Zealand police and its courts, from becoming public knowledge.

Court of Appeal judge Sir Maurice Casey, subsequently upholding Williamson’s ruling, said: “He was clearly right in seeking to prevent the trial becoming enmeshed in all the collateral and peripheral matters covered in the tapes not relied on by the Crown and about exposing the jury to the playing of many hours of irrelevant material, thereby distracting them from consideration of the real issues.”

These political tentacles, the main stream media affiliations and the attached nefarious personal relationships, started to appear once we had identified a few of the key names that the police, the crown prosecutor, several official judicial and ministerial inquiries, and the country’s courts had gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal, starting with the name suppression orders granted by Judge Neil Williamson at the conclusion of Peter Ellis’s 1993 trial. Identities long since buried, the identities of Peter Ellis’s accusers, a group of very strange, in most cases, fucked up women and men, people that have remained concealed for years, often behind fucked up pseudonyms, the likes of the most outspoken antagonist and pulp fiction author “JOY BANDER”.

“In case you need reminding, I wish to point out that Alec* & I are the ones who got Tommy* to talk in the first place”
Joy Bander*

(* pseudonyms used in her book “A Mother’s Story”)

Armed with these names the team at LF have unearthed some very strange connections and some even stranger institutional associations. Organisations that one would never have suspected could posibly have had any role to play in the Ellis case. Leftist leaning labour movements such as the Canterbury and Westland Hotel and Restaurant Workers Union, its organisers, men such as Andy Anderson, Robert Hutcheon, Mark Goshe and a young legal officer, fresh out of Canterbury University’s faculty of Law, Lianne Dalziel.

Howard Broad, The corrupt head of Christchurchs CIB at the time of the Ellis case

Howard Broad, The corrupt senior cop at the time of the Ellis case

Howard Broad’s press conference in October 1992 destroyed the careers and previously unblemished reputations of four well-qualified, experienced and dedicated child care workers” – Lynley Hood, A City Possessed

In fact LF believes that its these social connections that may well hold one of the keys to the Peter Ellis case, and the reasons behind the cases failure to gain any real traction, constantly hitting the proverbial brick wall, a wall that has grown inexplicably in size over the years, growth that “coincidentally” mirrored the rise and growth in power of certain politicians that have for decades remained concealed behind the name suppressions of a handful of accusers. Power which these politicians, perhaps understandably, have been very reluctant to relinquish.

LF is aware that Lianne Dalziel and her Christchurch union buddies, and of course various other young aspiring politicians during the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, acted in extraordinarily corrupt ways, as have many of the Dalziel sisters known Uni associates, all of whom attended the University of Canterbury, in particular the University’s faculties of Law and business. One of those Cantebury Uni good old boys being none other than the prosecutor in the Ellis case, Brent Stanaway.

Bent Christchurch Crown Prosecutor Brent Stanaway Ellis trial 1993

Bent Christchurch Raymond Donnelly & Co junior associate, Crown Prosecutor Brent Stanaway, about to sum up, Ellis trial 1993

LF is also aware that Lianne Dalziels recently appointed press secretary, Chris Rennie, is corrupt and has assisted in concealing corrupt behaviour on the part of Christchurch Police officers, and that he personally has, in order to conceal that corruption, engaged in press smear campaigns specifically designed to destroy the credibility of the various witnesses and victims tartgeted in unrelated cases. We are therefore very well placed to look at the Ellis case with a more astute set of eyes.

Chris  recently appointed Lianne Dalziels press secretary

The corrupt Chris Rennie, ex NBR Christchurch staffer, Jenni McManus lap dog, and an old time favourite, recently appointed Lianne Dalziels press secretary

Its LF’s view that much of the various other commentary and material written in and around the Ellis case, whilst extraordinary in its research, accuracy, detail and the academic rigour applied, has, as is often the case, been compromised by one thing alone. That is, the academics, investigators and authors had, in trying to appear impartial, avoided courting controversy, by starting from exactley the same default position as most unsuccessful crusaders for a cause; that being, that nothing of what had happened to Peter Ellis has been attributed to intentional, malevolent and or corrupt behaviour, that the police and Christchurch Crown law offices where in most of the efforts held to be honest upright citizens and not the systemically corrupt arseholes that in reality they were, and in some cases still are, the default position assumed by most of the commentators has been, in LF’s view, the single greatest weakness that has seen the Ellis case languish for what is now approaching 21 years, slowly, by design, passing into history, and the obscurity of New Zealands twisted legal mythology.

Screen Shot 2014-03-06 at 10.42.45 am

Click to read full story on the police corruption and perversion prevalent in Christchurch at the time Peter Ellis was falsely accused, singled out, charged and wrongely convicted

So to start we invite LF readers to watch the three videos below, excerpts from a televised documentary that aired in New Zealand around a decade ago, it will undoubtedly make your blood boil, it certainly did ours.

Part One – A question of judgement – Peter Ellis in his own words

Part Two – A question of Judgement

Part Three – A question of Judgement

Credits – A question of Judgement

References/Bibliography

Alison Dalziel’s Experience

Privately Held; 1-10 employees; Management Consulting industry

July 2012 – Present (1 year 9 months) Western Australia

Providing consulting services in the local government sector, including:
– strategic and corporate planning
– structure and business processes
– management and leading change
– economic and regional development

Nonprofit; 201-500 employees; Events Services industry

October 2013 – Present (6 months) Western Australia, Australia

This Club:
– is a forum for kiwis in WA to network
– is a support network for kiwis arriving in WA
– runs kiwi events in WA
– maintains and builds networks back between New Zealand and Australia
– is a voice for kiwis in Australia

Director

Dalziel Strategy and Performance Pty Ltd

July 2011 – July 2012 (1 year 1 month) Western Australia, Australia

Consulting in the local government sector, focusing on strategic and corporate planning, structure and management, and economic development.

Privately Held; 11-50 employees; Management Consulting industry

September 2009 – July 2011 (1 year 11 months)

Morrison Low consults in the public and private sectors with a particular focus on local government.

Senior Economist

NZIER

July 2008 – August 2009 (1 year 2 months)

Working across central and local governnment and the economic development sector, undertaking a variety of strategy and organisational projects.

Group Manager, Labour Market Development

Department of Labour

Government Agency; 1001-5000 employees; Government Administration industry

December 2004 – July 2008 (3 years 8 months)

For most of my time at the Department I headed up the labour market development area which worked with sectors and regions on strategies to improve labour market outcomes.

Government Agency; 501-1000 employees; Government Administration industry

March 2003 – December 2004 (1 year 10 months)

Responsible for the Sustainable Development Programme of Action and adviser to the Prime Minister on sustainable development, regional development and local government.

*click Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet” while it lasts. LF will be checking daily to establish the date and time removed and replacing with video demonstrating the link operating)

Source: Text, inclusive of hyper links, retrieved from http://au.linkedin.com/in/alisondalziel on the 1st March 2014 at 0500hrs (Netherlands, CET)

January 30th, 2008 at 8:45 am by David Farrar

Some issues are beyond politics.  The Peter Ellis case and convictions are one of them.

I totally endorse the call for a Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Ellis case.  One needs the latitude a full commission of inquiry has, to deal with the public’s deep scepticism over this case.

It should be in the interest of all politicians for there to be confidence in the justice system.  The Ellis case corrosively undermines that confidence.  While convictions are not a public popularity contest, I know of almost no-one who thinks the Ellis convictions are safe.  And this is based on a massive amount of published research on the case.

Annette King is the Minister of Justice. It is a pity she will not consider the merits of the case herself (she cites conflict as she is also Police Minister) as I have considerable regard for her judgement and ability. I think she could and would see the bigger picture (it is not just about Ellis who is now free – it is about the wider justice system). Lianne Dalziel can not be delegated the case, so it will fall to Clayton Cosgrove or Rick Barker.

The Minister who deals with this needs to be able to consider the issues carefully using their own judgement. They should not merely ask officials for a report and rubber-stamp it. I can tell you now that of course the Ministry of Justice will oppose a Royal Commission  into the Ellis case.

I know many (not all) National MPs have a deep concern over the Ellis case. Katherine Rich and Don Brash helped lead the charge a few years ago for such a Commission. While I can in no way speak for them, I am sure National would in no way criticise the Government if it did hold a Royal Commission.  And I think all the minor parties would be supportive.

There will be a lot of partisan behaviour this year in the NZ blogosphere.  What would be great though is to have as many blogs as possible join a campaign for an Ellis Royal Commission.  We have one of the true experts on the case with Poneke, and could keep the case in profile by doing stuff ranging from all displaying a prominent graphic calling for the Royal Commission, to pledging to blog or link to a blog on the issue at least a fortnight or something. I am sure Poneke could generate enough materialfor us to link to or summarise.

Source: http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/do_the_right_thing_on_ellis_case.html

Further Reading:

Summary of the case history

On 20 November 1991, only 17 days after the Sunday News newspaper featured an article that claimed that satanic ritual abuse was rampant in New Zealand, Sally Ruth, a mother of an infant attending the Christchurch Civic Child Care Centre, made to supervisor Gaye Davidson the first complaint of “inappropriate sexual behaviour” against Peter Ellis. Ellis, 33, was an experienced, qualified pre-school teacher employed by the childcare centre. Ellis was suspended from work the following day. Ruth, referred to by author Lynley Hood as Ms Magnolia, formally complained to police on 25 November. Her child did not disclose abuse to specialist interviewers during the course of subsequent investigation and was not party to later court proceedings. A mass meeting of childcare centre parents was held in December, and rumours fuelled by gossip and media reports flew about amongst the parents and Christchurch citizenry. The first formal allegation made by a child arose in January 1992, but this child had never been enrolled in the Civic childcare centre, and was not a subsequent witness at the trial. On 23 March 1992, the Holmes television show presented an item on the childcare centre. During that item, Karen Zelas (the prosecution’s expert witness) talked about the possibility of abuse at the childcare centre, and listed behaviours that could indicate abuse. On 31 March, there was another significant meeting of parents in Knox Hall, at which a flyer listing “indicators of sexual abuse” was handed out to parents.

Continue reading at: http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/r.christie/Introduction.html

Peter Ellis.org website: http://www.peterellis.org.nz/2008/index.htm

Enhanced by Zemanta

Labour to be destroyed in the next election? – Greens to prosper if they stay sane!

David Shearer was a good guy – but like so many other leftie pollies he ain’t got the mongrel that Nat leaders have. Look at Key – that fucktard is all dog.

“John “cunt” Key – a man that is widely hated in New Zealand, but who could lead again because of Labours infighting and lack of integrity”

“John “cunt” Key – a man that is widely hated in New Zealand, but who could lead again because of Labours infighting and lack of integrity”

Inspirational Labour leaders like Norm Kirk, and to a lesser extent David Lange, worked the magic for a short time, but sure enough they were betrayed by their mates once power was obtained.

“Big Norm – inspirational Labour leader – a man that stood for something other than himself”

“Big Norm – inspirational Labour leader – a man that stood for something other than himself”

Phil Goff was no better than Bill Rowling when it came to media grunt, although Rowling was not a featherweight bullshit artist like Goff.

“Under-rated because he was soft spoken and believe it or not shorter than Muldoon – and could never shake his previous employment as a “teacher”.  A man amongst boys, a boy amongst men”

“Under-rated because he was soft spoken and believe it or not shorter than Muldoon – and could never shake his previous employment as a “teacher”. A man amongst boys, a boy amongst men”

Rowling was “pro choice” in a time when everyone else was “no choice” when it came to abortion.  This is probably his legacy and which legacy came from his time seeing teenage school girls having their lives wrecked by having to have unplanned pregnancies go to term.

“Phillipa Goof – a Freudian slip – but he may have been taken seriously if he had admitted he was a lesbian like Prime Minister Helen Clarke – also an intellectual featherweight”

“Phillipa Goof – a Freudian slip – but he may have been taken seriously if he had admitted he was a lesbian like Prime Minister Helen Clarke – also an intellectual featherweight”

Now we turn to Robert Muldoon – a man that did a lot of great things for his people but stopped short of being able to defeat the 1984 Labour Government that destroyed the lives of its supporters with up to 26% interest rates on home mortgages.

muldoon1

“The last statesman to represent New Zealand overseas when the British, the States, and the Chinese, took New Zealand seriously.   Compare this to President Putins treatment of John “cunt” Key – Muldoon was also a strong advocate for the individuals rights against big business and the state – Muldoon “arranged” for the freedom of Arthur Alan Thomas after a single meeting with author David Yallop”

“The last statesman to represent New Zealand overseas when the British, the States, and the Chinese, took New Zealand seriously. Compare this to President Putins treatment of John “cunt” Key – Muldoon was also a strong advocate for the individuals rights against big business and the state – Muldoon “arranged” for the freedom of Arthur Alan Thomas after a single meeting with author David Yallop”

Helen Clarke and David Lange won elections for Labour but importantly in different times.   Lange did it when it was first past the post, and Clarke did it under MMP.

“Lange caught in a more intelligent moment – unfortunately for New Zealand this man was all piss and wind”

“Lange caught in a more intelligent moment – unfortunately for New Zealand this man was all piss and wind”

Labour with Lange came to power when New Zealand had had enough of Muldoon’s domineering style and when Bob Jones, a narcissist selfish fucktard property developer, decided to start a party to split the vote.  The result was the disaster of the David Lange Government.  Of course Lange cannot be blamed for what occurred as the blame lies with the likes of lightweight lawyer and previous “replacement Prime Minister” Geoffrey “drunkcunt” Palmer – a complete scumbag, reprobate and liar.

“Bullshit supremo and low rent fuckthug for the likes of Roger Douglas – the man responsible for the failure of New Zealand on such a scale never seen before – until the advent of John Key”

“Bullshit supremo and low rent fuckthug for the likes of Roger Douglas – the man responsible for the failure of New Zealand on such a scale never seen before – until the advent of John Key”

Helen Clarke, the first lesbian Prime Minister of New Zealand and that’s about her claim to fame – except she lied about it.

“Prime Minister Helen Clark carried a dark secret – she is closely related to Phil Goff – both are useless cunts”

“Prime Minister Helen Clark carried a dark secret – she is closely related to Phil Goff – both are useless cunts”

Now LF turns to the main contenders for replacing David Shearer.

“Shearer has at least the looks of a leader and the credentials of a successful former life.  Labour has made a big mistake considering how low Helen Clarke was in the Polls until she creamed Jennifer Shipley”

“Shearer has at least the looks of a leader and the credentials of a successful former life. Labour has made a big mistake considering how low Helen Clarke was in the Polls until she creamed Jennifer Shipley”

Other possible contenders are few and far between, but there are numerous Labour MPs that have as little talent as Robertson and Cunliffe.

“Jenny “nipple tits” Shipley – another ugly useless cunt “

“Jenny “nipple tits” Shipley – another ugly useless cunt “

David Cunliffe is well – yet another New Zealand useless cunt – a man that has become a Labour politician because he could not become a National Politician.  New Zealand should watch out for this prick as LF sees another Roger Douglas.

“Davina cuntlips cunliffe – prettier than Clarke but still yet another useless cunt. Married to a lawyer on the fucking gravy train, and never held a real job – lives in a multi million dollar house whilst alleging he represents the worker – another “Douglas"?”

“Davina cuntlips cunliffe – prettier than Clarke but still yet another useless cunt. Married to a lawyer on the fucking gravy train, and never held a real job – lives in a multi million dollar house whilst alleging he represents the worker – another “Douglas”?”

Supposedly the other contender is Grant Robertson – fucking who? – we say.

To show how fucked up New Zealand media is we quote the following from the New Zealand Listener;

“The Wellington Central MP is famous on Lambton Quay and stretches of Willis St. In Auckland, those who have heard of him occasionally edit his name to Robinson, the way people added an “s” to Key until he was well into the premiership. So, no, Labour’s new deputy leader isn’t the next big thing yet. But he could be the next Deputy Prime Minister and he could even be, one day, our first gay Prime Minister.”

Your first gay Prime Minister – what about fucking Clark?.  Oh that’s right she lied about her sexuality by hiding in a sham marriage with a gay man in order that her political career would not be smashed – dumb bitch.

Other possible contenders are few and far between, but there are numerous Labour MPs that have as little talent as Robertson and Cunliffe.

Ex Union boss Andrew Little is one such bloke, but in our opinion he is more adequate Minister material as he does not appear to seek the limelight like particularly Cunliffe does.

“A good keen bloke, but too much for little at this stage.  Should be a Green party member”

“A good keen bloke, but too much for little at this stage. Should be a Green party member”

Another subliminal contender and yet another gay bloke is Clayton Cosgrove who holds the safe labour seat previously held by Mike Moore.  Cosgrove even looks like Mike;

“He’s got more hair for now than Mike Moore but his name Clayton is so fucking retarded it brings back memories of Claytons whiskey – whiskey with no alcohol – why fucking bother - also gay”

“He’s got more hair for now than Mike Moore but his name Clayton is so fucking retarded it brings back memories of Claytons whiskey – whiskey with no alcohol – why fucking bother – also gay”

“Mike Moore – the Labour Prime Minister that lost to Jim “Spud” Bolger and who prides himself on inventing the Lamb Burger”

“Mike Moore – the Labour Prime Minister that lost to Jim “Spud” Bolger and who prides himself on inventing the Lamb Burger”

Some say Shane Jones could be in the mix as a Deputy if he does not decide to make a run to hold the office when the Labour Party is decimated at the Polls by the Greens;

“More chins than the Dunedin phone book, but Jones  has some of Norm Kirks qualities – likely to die reasonably young”

“More chins than the Dunedin phone book, but Jones has some of Norm Kirks qualities – likely to die reasonably young”

Then theres good old Tevor Mallard – complete old school Labour tosser.   Been in parliament due to a safe Labour seat.  A person that is definitely not a contender but whom will have the knives out to kill the hopes of anyone that does not like him – which is most of the house.

“Convicted violent offender Trevor “ducker and diver” Mallard – a twat if there was ever one – but a confrontational spastic fuck as well, and previously another fucking teacher”.

“Convicted violent offender Trevor “ducker and diver” Mallard – a twat if there was ever one – but a confrontational spastic fuck as well, and previously another fucking teacher”.

So there you have it.  LF’s opinion on who’s who, and the fact that Labour is for a rough ride now that David Shearer was pushed by the threat of another leadership challenge.

The truth of the matter is that the Green Party has more brains, more integrity, and more ideas that the Labour party.  Now that Labour is more middle than left, what difference is there to National?.

Whoever wins the leadership better get their act together really quickly, and who that person appoints as spokespersons in important roles will be crucial as to whether Labour comes second to the Greens.

With MMP it would appear that New Zealanders are beginning to understand that they can elect the persons they want from any party to form a coalition.  What faces Labour is whether they will get their share of the vote to be the senior party in any coalition should National not obtain a clear majority, or not be in a position to govern with the votes of say friendly parties such as possibly New Zealand First.

It is very clear that the Greens will pick up a much bigger protest vote than ever before mainly because the voters are tired of free loading Labour politicians that win seats in safe areas.

The Greens get elected on passing the 5% threshold and it appears that they are not a personality driven party, but have finally got some leadership from across the Tasman that may see the party become safe for the foreseeable future.

“Australian Russell Norman - Unlike the Labour twats above, Norman exudes integrity and ability – a real contender to put the New Zealand Greens on the Global stage”

“Australian Russell Norman – Unlike the Labour twats above, Norman exudes integrity and ability – a real contender to put the New Zealand Greens on the Global stage”

Given the trend in Europe and indeed all over the first world LF cannot see how the Green Party wont be more and more attractive as a viable alternative as long as they understand that New Zealand is a basically poor country and that change will have financial challenges that need to be balanced.

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 246 other followers

%d bloggers like this: